Pope Francis, The Magenta Catholic

Saturday, September 21, 2013 - 8:01am
Pope Francis, The Magenta Catholic

Charles Camosy argues that only in a world dominated by our lazy binaries could Pope Francis be considered "liberal" simply because he doesn't fit into "conservative" categories.

Commentary by:
Charles C. Camosy (@nohiddenmagenta),  Guest Contributor
Shortened URL
22 ReflectionsRead/Add Yours

Pope Francis prays in Saint Peter's square at the Vatican on September 7, 2013.

License: AFP/Getty Images.

Lots of people are talking about our (still very new) Bishop of Rome — and especially his recent interview in America. Mark Silk says we have a "liberal" pope. So do Rod Dreher and many other commentators.

Do we? Perhaps it shows the limits of using secular political language that I'm not exactly sure what it means for Pope Francis to be considered "liberal" (thank goodness for America's new editorial policy rejecting the use of secular political categories in a Catholic context), but most self-described Catholic liberals are against authoritarian popes. How does this pope describe himself in the interview?

"My authoritarian and quick manner of making decisions led me to have serious problems and to be accused of being ultraconservative."

Catholic liberals are also generally suspicious of "pre-Vatican II" liturgical and devotional practices. Like use of the Latin language, praying of the rosary, and Eucharistic adoration. How does Pope Francis feel about these things? From the interview:

"I pray the breviary [in Latin] every morning. I like to pray with the psalms. Then, later, I celebrate Mass. I pray the Rosary. What I really prefer is adoration in the evening, even when I get distracted and think of other things, or even fall asleep praying. In the evening then, between seven and eight o’clock, I stay in front of the Blessed Sacrament for an hour in adoration."

But if there is one thing we know after the America interview yesterday, Pope Francis wants us to lay off issues like abortion, right? Except the very next day after the interview was published, Pope Francis said the following in an address to gynecologists:

“Every unborn child, condemned unjustly to be aborted, has the face of the Lord…. Although by their nature they are at the service of life, health professions are sometimes induced to disregard life itself…. If you lose the personal and social sensitivity towards the acceptance of a new life, then other forms of acceptance that are valuable for society also wither away. The acceptance of life strengthens moral fiber and makes people capable of mutual help.”

The point Francis is making, which Benedict XVI and John Paul II have been making (less well) for decades, is that abortion is connected to a host of very important issues. If you obsess over abortion, you not only do a disservice to the Gospel (which is, of course, primary), you also paradoxically undermine your ability to work for justice of our prenatal children. One of the things which makes yesterday's interview so powerful is that Francis has been far more effective in making this point than were his predecessors. But the point he made is perhaps the guiding principle of Benedict's Caritas in Veritate.

Only in a world dominated by our lazy liberal/conservative, red/blue binary could Pope Francis be considered "liberal" simply because he doesn't fit into "conservative" categories. Quite rightly, Francis is a magenta Catholic — unburdened by the totally inadequate secular political categories that almost everyone is once again using to discuss and judge his papacy. And he gives every sign that he will continue to confound the wisdom of our time — but this, of course, is precisely what we should expect from the Gospel.

Shortened URL

Charles C. Camosy is an assistant professor of Christian ethics at Fordham University in the Bronx. He works on initiatives that foster intellectual solidarity between binary groups that find conversation difficult. He serves on the ethics committee of the Children’s Hospital of New York and as an advisory board member for the New Evangelical Partnership for the Common Good. He's the author of the forthcoming book, For Love of Animals: Christian Ethics, Consistent Action and regularly blogs at Catholic Moral Theology.

Add Your Reflection

Filtered HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><span><div><img><!-->
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Embed content by wrapping a supported URL in [embed] … [/embed].

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Pope Francis' recent statements about abortion, same sex relationships, and atheists tend to lead us Protestants to believe the Roman Catholic tradition is moving into a new era. By appearing to espouse a more open Gospel and a wider acceptance of Christian beliefs, he is appearing to lead the "Church" in an ecumenical direction. Eventually, his actions, theological writings, and the administrative hierarchy of the church will demonstrate to the rest of the Christian world if he is a true reformer or simply possesses an appealing personality.
I believe his actions will speak louder than his words much like his name-sake, St. Francis of Assisi, who said, "preach the Gospel at all times and when necessary use words."

Thanks for your interest in your "congregation's" reaction to this article, and to its subject. Listening to "On Being" is the closest I get to participation in a spiritual assembly, virtual as it is. About this Pope, it seems that the changes he proposes are about what gets top billing in public and media discussion, not what his organization's policies are. Like the republican party pretending to be sympathetic to the challenges and injustices undocumented immigrants face - it wants to change its image for its own benefit, but not actually extend real help to anyone who really needs it.

So sorry, but the Pope is not moving closer to a Protestant view of issues. Abortion, homosexual acts, etc., are still sins and always will be. The Pope was just trying to frame these actions in a broader context.

Virtual works for a while, but nothing beats face-to-face. Go find some kinfolk. If it's a good fit, you'll know it, and you'll open an entirely new aspect of life you never knew existed.

This is a tough piece to write. People are saying he's Liberal. Others are saying, "not so fast." Which is really what Camosy is saying in this piece (Conservative red+Liberal blue=Catholic magenta).

I was disappointed with it as a result. To create conservative statements from Francis, Camosy has to isolate some of what Pope Francis has said, For example, concerning the first citation about his quick decisions. Prof. Camosy knows that Francis is describing the way he learned that he had to consult with others before making decisions. It's not a conservative statement.

In the interview Pope Francis says that he prays the breviary. Most priests do. Does he pray it in Latin? He may, but he didn't say that in this interview. Those words are bracketed, because Camosy has added them in. My point is, praying the breviary isn't Liberal or Conservative. It is Catholic, and the reference is made in a way that's self-serving.

The reference to the Pope's message to gynecologists also falls short. Did the Pope say what's excerpted? Yes. Except he didn't stop where Camosy would have you think. Pope Francis also said:

"In the fragile human being each one of us is invited to recognize the face of the Lord, who in his human flesh experienced the indifference and solitude to which we often condemn the poorest, whether in developing countries or in wealthy societies,"

"Every unborn child, though unjustly condemned to be aborted, has the face of the Lord, who even before his birth, and then as soon as he was born, experienced the rejection of the world," he said. "And every old person, even if infirm and at the end of his days, carries with him the face of Christ. They must not be thrown away!"

Now, is the Pope Magenta? Yes. Because the Catholic Church is magenta.

I think a better piece would consider why people are responding to Pope Francis.

In my opinion, part of that is because he's reminding folks that the Church is more than Blue, or Red. We all carry those tensions, don't we? Abortion may make a person uncomfortable. That same individual may not have a problem with the death penalty. At the most basic level, they both end a life. The difference has to do with what we think are valid reasons for either.

It's that, and it's more. Pope Francis is reminding us that life isn't--to add a different duality--black or white. He said, "Who am I to judge?" His statements are the most pastoral we've heard from a Pope in memory. Francis knows he's a sinner. As the Pope he's been speaking as an adult to adults. What do adults know? We know that in life, there is a lot of grey. And really, since that is the case, "who are we to judge."


I think the author is right. Americans (in and out of the Media) do indeed look for simplistic binary classifications. But we also confuse public activity with private conviction (which most visibly dominates our political dialogue). What makes Pope Francis unique is his view of the big picture. He questions whether the Church's focus toward narrow goals is leaving moral and spiritual voids in the lives of faithful Catholics while simultaneously serving as hopeless barriers to lapsed Catholics.


My take on Pope Francis as a faithful Catholic and regular Mass attending, Praying Liturgy of the Hours in the Morning & Evening - and involved in the life of my parish... is not so much "liberal" specifically but more "a huge breath of fresh air".

I am a non practicing Catholic. And it was John XXIII that ignited my interest at age 7 when he became pope and I attended catechism. At fourteen my biblical scholarly endeavors were cut short by y fathers total disdain for organized religion. But in October 1978 when John Paul II became pope my interest was rekindled. Now I am siding with the Leadership Conference on Women Religious and believe after reading ZEALOT by Resa Aslan I am on the right path.
semper Fidelis


Top Blog Posts

With the dulcet tones of the Copenhagen Phil, commuters find a moment of unexpected musical joy in this flash mob scene. You will too.
A worthy week filled with viral videos that will make you rethink your use of language and make you smile, and posts about a writer's prayer journal and a poem from Rumi that will inspire you.
At our darkest hours, when light fails to find a home, a path of buttercups may lead us back. Parker Palmer offers up thoughts and a Willow Harth poem for many of us caught "underground."
Parker Palmer reflects on "sharing our loves and doubts" as way into more generous conversations — all through the lens of a poem by Yehuda Amichai.
When a millennial woman hears about Buddhist teachings on overcoming anger through love, she decides to try out a meditation practice experiment on her own social media feeds.