Add new comment

"Why the change? Why Being? What does it all mean?"

What kind of being? Ousia? Heidegger? What?

"But we also want to reassure you that we are not losing faith in a programmatic sense. The name change is not a signal of a change in the editorial vision or content."

After reading these explanations, I just threw up in my mouth a little. Isn't this just spin indicating that in fact, it is exactly what you are doing? Isn't this indicating the ongoing shift from "Faith" traditions to considering all matter of post-modernist "beliefs"? Wouldn't the new format better be called "All things considered"?