Add new comment

Honestly, I prefer Hillel's version, for the simple reason that I can always be certain that, if I do not want something done to me, someone else is very likely to not want it done to them. The reverse is not necessarily true. For instance, how many people would want to live out the life of the heroine of the novel that made Pauline Réage famous? Yet, someone who does have such desires could innocently trespass against another by assuming that her desires are shared. By taking what some consider the "negative" form of the Golden Rule, one does not risk harming others due to mistaken assumptions.