Add new comment

How can it be that a professor, a scholar - a person, one would presume, at the highest level of education in their subject matter - can write about these bible stories as if they truly happened while even laymen are aware that corroboration outside of the bible, e.g. archeology and history ranges from scant to none? Not to mention "angels" or "heavenly messengers" for which no evidence (that a "scholar" ought deem acceptable) has ever been provided.